Optimization of Cutoff Shields in Projection Headlight Systems to Achieve High Intensity Gradient and Low Color Separation at the Cutoff Line
- Author: Joo Byung-Yun, Ko Jae-Hyeon
- Publish: Journal of the Optical Society of Korea Volume 20, Issue1, p118~124, 25 Feb 2016
The shape and location of the cutoff shield in a projection-type headlight system were optimized by a ray-tracing technique. A shield based on a Petsval surface showed better cutoff characteristics than a flat or cylindrical shield, such as a sharp intensity gradient and less color separation at the cutoff line. Adjustment of the shield’s location between the reflector and the aspheric lens further improved its cutoff characteristics.
Projection headlight , Cutoff shield , Color separation , Optical simulation
The automotive lighting system is an important part of a vehicle, for the driver’s safety and comfort. Recent development of car headlights has been focused on improving the driver’s emotional satisfaction. For example, intelligent headlamps, such as AFS (adaptive front-lighting system), and matrix headlamps [1, 2], have been studied and developed, and can be used to reduce the glare that an oncoming driver may experience, as well as to enhance the illumination needed by the car’s own driver. In addition, it is necessary to reduce the color lines at the cutoff line; for example, the bluish line caused by high-intensity-discharge headlamps should be removed, using an appropriate optical design. The range of color coordinates in the illumination area of the headlamps is defined by regulations, the SAE and ECE white limits (SAE, 1995; ECE, 2001) . In spite of the fact that color dispersion at the cutoff line is not dealt with in these regulations, reduction of color lines has been requested by car makers for better driver satisfaction.
Figure 1(a) shows a schematic optical structure for a typical projection headlight. The light emitted from the source, which is located at one of the two foci, is collected on the other focus via the quasiellipsoidal mirror. This focus is the same as the focal point of the aspheric lens, realizing parallel rays after departing the lens. However, the rays incident on points near the focus of the aspheric lens are spreading along horizontal or vertical directions. In the case of the low beam emitted from a car headlight, there is a legal regulation that defines the intensity test points, and the headlight should satisfy the standard for the intensity distribution.
[FIG. 1.] (a) Schematic diagram of a typical projection headlight system, and typical ray paths therein. (b) A chart showing the intensity test points for beam pattern in the candela space, as included in the ECE-R112 regulation.
Figure 1(b) shows the intensity test points in the candela space, according to the ECE-R112 regulation . Regarding the cutoff line in the figure, the intensity should be dark above this line and bright below, i.e. the intensity gradient should be very large along the cutoff line. As one specification for the intensity contrast at the cutoff line, the minimum value for the intensity gradient at X = −2.3°, which is the glare index G, is prescribed to be G = 0.08 in SAE and 0.13 in ECE . To form this cutoff line, a cutoff shield is located near the focus as an aperture stop to absorb light.
From the viewpoint of a car maker, reducing weight, number of components, and material cost have been very important in developing headlights with new optical designs and functionality. One approach is to switch the lens material from flint glass to plastic, and polycarbonate (PC) has been preferred over acrylic materials because of its high thermal stability. However, a PC lens sometimes suffers from color separation at the cutoff line due to the inherent dispersion of the material, i.e. the substantial dependence of its refractive index on the wavelength of light. Reducing this color dispersion by adopting an appropriate optical structure is necessary for using PC lenses in car headlamps.
Optical simulation has been an important tool for developing and optimizing the optical structures of automotive lighting systems [6, 7]. This study aims at the optimization of the shield geometry at the cutoff shield for a projection headlight, to realize a high intensity gradient and low color separation at the cutoff line. For this purpose, we adopt a PC-based aspheric lens. The performance of the proposed Petsval-surface-based shield is compared to those of previous flat or cylindrical shields using the ray-tracing technique. In particular, cutoff characteristics of the intensity and degree of the color separation are analyzed and compared in detail.
Understanding the Petsval surface of an aspheric lens is important for an analysis of the formation of the intensity gradient and color distribution at the cutoff line. The Petsval surface can be considered as the three-dimensional (focal) curved surface consisting of the focal points formed by the lens, depending on the angle of incidence of the oblique parallel ray bundle incident upon the aspherical surface of the lens. That is, there is a functional correspondence between the three-dimensional coordinates (
x, y, z) of the points comprising the Petsval surface of the lens and the emitting angle (X, Y) of the beam pattern in the candela space. We can control the angular intensity distribution (X, Y) by making the rays emitted from the light source be appropriately incident upon the Petsval surface.
The Petsval surface of an aspheric lens with a diameter of 70 mm and a focal length of 40.187 mm can be obtained by using a ray-tracing simulation technique, as shown in Fig. 2(a). In this figure A, B, C, and D denote the parallel ray bundles at illumination angles of (0°, 0°) (abbreviated as X0Y0) and X10Y0, X20Y0, and X30Y0 respectively, which were incident on the lens from the opposite side, i.e. the front side of the headlight. In this study we obtained the three-dimensional coordinates of the focal point of each ray bundle by positioning an illumination receiver near the focal point. The “calculated best focus” option in the commercial ray-tracing software (LightTools v. 8.2 ) was used for this process. Focusing the ray bundles was easy for paraxial rays, but the rays incident at high angles contributed to blurring, due to coma aberration. Accordingly, the Petsval surface obtained in this way may be considered to be approximate. Figure 2(b) shows the shape of the approximate Petsval surface. The X and Y ranges were chosen to be −38°−38° and −14°−14° respectively, by considering the necessary intensity distribution of the low beam required by the specification at the design stage. The angular resolution of the incident parallel ray bundle was 2° and 1° for the X and Y directions respectively. The inflection points at the right and left ends of the Petsval surface in the
xz-view seem to be due to the approximation error caused by the lens aberration. The points shown on the xy-view of the Petsval surface are the focal points formed by the ray bundles, which were used for the approximation of the Petsval surface.
Figure 3 shows the linear relationship between the intensity angular coordinate system and the Petsval surface coordinate system in the candela space. Figure 3(a) shows the linear relationship between Y and
y. The glare index Gof the headlight beam pattern can be obtained by calculating the logarithmic value of the intensity ratio according to Eq. (1), when the cutoff line is scanned in steps of 0.1° along the Y direction at X = −2.3° . In this equation IY denotes the intensity along the Y direction, and Φ ythe flux at yon the Petsval surface. Figure 3(b) shows the scanning direction in the candela space and the corresponding change in yon the Petsval surface. The increment of 0.1° along the Y direction in the intensity angular coordinate system corresponds to Δ y= −0.096 mm in the Petsval-surface coordinate system. Similarly, the increment of −2.3° along the X direction corresponds to Δ x= +2.39 mm. In other words, the intensity ratio can be expressed as the flux ratio on the Petsval surface, and the cutoff intensity gradient can be controlled by controlling the flux on the Petsval surface.
We carried out ray-tracing simulations for a point source located at the focal point of the lens under different emission angles, to investigate the color separation at the upper part of the cutoff line. Figure 4 shows this ray-tracing process. The emission spectrum of this point source is shown in Figure 5(a), which is a typical spectrum for an HID lamp. The dispersion of the refractive index of the PC lens is given by the Raurent model, as shown by Eq. (2) and in Fig. 5(b).
[FIG. 4.] Color separation of cut-off line boundary, depending on the direction of the incident rays: (a) rays incident on the lower part of the lens, (b) rays incident on the upper part of the lens, and (c) rays incident on both parts of the lens.
The unit of wavelength in Eq. (2) is μm. According to the simulation result, it was found that the rays headed toward the lower part of the lens contributed to the bluish color above the cutoff line (Fig. 4(a)), while the rays headed toward the upper part of the lens contributed to the reddish color above the cutoff line (Fig. 4(b)). This is mainly due to the chromatic aberration of the PC lens, which cannot be avoided unless the PC is replaced with a low-dispersion material. Therefore, the only way to minimize the color-separation problem is to use color mixing of the rays incident on the lower and the upper parts of the lens, as shown in Fig. 4(c). This result indicates that the degree of color separation may be altered, depending on the
z-offset (offset along the optical axis) of the cutoff shield. Accordingly, balancing the effects of the incident rays toward the upper and lower parts of the lens, and thus minimizing the color-separation problem, may become easier if we use the Petsval surface as the shape for the cutoff shield.